All the AI that matters, in one place.
Search covers the labs, the trade press, the courts, and the regulators. Swap in a Programmable Search Engine before launch.
Anthropic, the company behind the Claude chatbot, is reportedly going ahead with plans to sell shares to the public, according to a Wall Street Journal report relayed by TechCrunch. The company is said to be setting a valuation range this week and could begin trading on Thursday or Friday of next week. The timing is notable because the listing would follow one of the Nasdaq's biggest sell-offs and revelations about a chief executive central to the AI boom. Some large investors are reportedly pushing for a value below the $1.5 trillion figure discussed last week, which was itself well under the $2 trillion once floated. OpenAI, its main rival, was reportedly valued at $1.25 trillion last week after raising $11 billion, less than the $20 billion it first sought. For readers with retirement accounts or index funds, the price investors are willing to pay will be an early gauge of how confident the market remains in AI.
TechCrunch — Nov. 10
Anthropic's two newest flagship models score higher on outside tests and cost about a fifth less to use, which pushes down the price of AI tools built on them.
The chip giant at the center of the AI boom is under a board investigation and market pressure over its CEO's relationship with a suspected Chinese spy, raising questions about the whole sector's stability.
Voter backlash against data centers plus Nvidia's leadership crisis could slow AI development in a way the industry has said it wants but could not do on its own.
A practical list of ways to use ChatGPT to decide what is worth buying and to check your purchases before and during Black Friday sales.
A hands-on comparison of what you really get from the $20 coding-assistant plans from OpenAI and Anthropic, useful before paying for either.
A plain-English glossary of the seven AI terms, such as tokens, that help non-technical readers follow AI news and use the tools with more confidence.
One thing everyone is talking about, checked against what was actually said.
A researcher who spent three years on pretraining work at OpenAI and Anthropic resigned this week and posted that both companies are racing toward self-improving superintelligence. The headlines took the most alarming sentence and ran. Two things got left behind.
The first is that a departing researcher issuing a warning has become close to a genre. What made this one unusual is what happened next: Anthropic's own Alignment Science Lead, still at the company, agreed in public and put his estimate above one in ten within the decade. Senior staff almost never confirm a departing critic on the record.
The second is a line nearly every headline dropped. He said the risk from the models available right now is low, and that what concerns him is a future system improving itself faster than anyone can check it. Those are two different claims, and only one of them was made.
So, no, not the assistant on your phone — the people raising the alarm say so themselves. What they are describing is real, seriously contested inside the field, and some years out, and nobody involved claims it has been solved. Worth holding onto one caveat: a probability posted on social media is a considered guess, not a measurement.
The IPO story is really about how much confidence to place in big claims about AI, and most of us face a smaller version of it when a vendor or colleague promises a tool will transform our work. This prompt asks an AI to read that claim the way a skeptical analyst would. It sorts what is evidenced from what is hope.
Supplied as-is for general information. AI tools state wrong answers as confidently as right ones, so verify anything before you act on it. Nothing here is legal, financial, medical, or tax advice — for those, ask someone licensed to give it. Don't paste confidential, proprietary, or personal information into a tool whose terms let it train on what you type.