BREAKING

My Daily Prompt

All the AI that matters, in one place.

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2026 DAILY EDITION NO. 053

Search covers the labs, the trade press, the courts, and the regulators. Swap in a Programmable Search Engine before launch.

By the Numbers every figure sourced and dated

529,914
U.S. job cuts announced in 2026
Challenger, Gray & Christmas · through Aug
22%
Share of those cuts citing AI
Challenger, Gray & Christmas · through Aug
19.8%
U.S. businesses using AI in any business function
Census Bureau · survey to May 3
565 TWh
Global data-center electricity this year, up 26%
Gartner · June 2026
38 GW
Microsoft's data-center capacity target for 2032
Bloomberg · Sept 2026
16.48¢
Average U.S. home electricity, per kWh
EIA · 2024, latest annual
LEAD STORY

Anthropic sets IPO price range of $70 to $78 per share to reach an implied valuation of $1.404 trillion

Anthropic, the company behind the Claude assistant, has set out the terms of its planned stock market listing. In an updated filing on Tuesday it said it would offer 825 million shares at $70 to $78 each, raising roughly $58 billion to $64 billion. At the top of that range the company would be valued at about $1.4 trillion, well above the $965 billion it reached in May but below the $2 trillion it was reportedly aiming for. Anthropic has also agreed to sell $26 billion of non-voting shares to chip and cloud companies, with Google and Nvidia each putting in $10 billion. The founders keep a special class of share carrying just over half the voting power. The price range is a useful gauge of how much confidence investors still have in AI after a shakier few weeks, and of how closely the tools many people use at work depend on a few very large companies.

TechCrunch — Nov. 10

Top Stories

Use AI

What's Next

Should You Worry?

WEEKLY

One thing everyone is talking about, checked against what was actually said.

Did an AI researcher just say the technology will kill everyone?

REAL — BUT NOT ABOUT THE AI YOU USE TODAY

A researcher who spent three years on pretraining work at OpenAI and Anthropic resigned this week and posted that both companies are racing toward self-improving superintelligence. The headlines took the most alarming sentence and ran. Two things got left behind.

The first is that a departing researcher issuing a warning has become close to a genre. What made this one unusual is what happened next: Anthropic's own Alignment Science Lead, still at the company, agreed in public and put his estimate above one in ten within the decade. Senior staff almost never confirm a departing critic on the record.

The second is a line nearly every headline dropped. He said the risk from the models available right now is low, and that what concerns him is a future system improving itself faster than anyone can check it. Those are two different claims, and only one of them was made.

So, no, not the assistant on your phone — the people raising the alarm say so themselves. What they are describing is real, seriously contested inside the field, and some years out, and nobody involved claims it has been solved. Worth holding onto one caveat: a probability posted on social media is a considered guess, not a measurement.

Reported by Axios, Forbes and CBC — Sept. 9

Prompt of the Day

TIED TO TODAY'S LEAD

Anthropic's price range is a reminder that big ambitions get tested once someone has to put a number on them. Most of us meet a smaller version of this at work: a proposal, a new tool or a project that arrives with a confident promise attached. This prompt helps you separate what the case actually shows from what it only hopes for.

Below is a short description of a proposal, project or new tool I am being asked to support at work. Act as a skeptical, practical finance director, not as an enthusiast. Do not speculate beyond what I have written. 1. What is the main promise being made? Quote the line from my description that states it. 2. Which claims are backed by something concrete, such as a figure, a trial or a past result, and which are only expectations? Quote my words for each. 3. What would have to go right for the promise to come true, and which of those things is the least certain? 4. Where does my description not settle whether this is worth the cost? Say so plainly. If my description does not give you enough to answer something, say so rather than guessing. Finish with the single question I should ask before agreeing to support it. --- [paste a description of the proposal in general terms only — no confidential figures, client names or personal details]

Supplied as-is for general information. AI tools state wrong answers as confidently as right ones, so verify anything before you act on it. Nothing here is legal, financial, medical, or tax advice — for those, ask someone licensed to give it. Don't paste confidential, proprietary, or personal information into a tool whose terms let it train on what you type.