BREAKING

My Daily Prompt

All the AI that matters, in one place.

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2026 DAILY EDITION NO. 001

Search covers the labs, the trade press, the courts, and the regulators. Swap in a Programmable Search Engine before launch.

By the Numbers refreshed each morning

209,032
Workers in tracked layoff events this year
Layoff trackers
54%
Share of those events naming AI
Layoffs.fyi
17.44¢
Average U.S. home electricity, per kWh
EIA
565 TWh
Data-center electricity this year, up 26%
IEA-based analysis
38 GW
Microsoft's data-center target for 2032
Bloomberg
$965B
Anthropic's valuation ahead of a listing
Reuters
LEAD STORY

OpenAI Considers Slowing Advanced AI Development, Sam Altman Tells Employees

Sam Altman told employees that OpenAI is open to easing off its most advanced work — but only if its rivals do the same, and only if Washington says a coordinated pause would be lawful. The company has put that second question to Congress directly. It lands in a week when a researcher's resignation from Anthropic pushed members of both parties toward talk of federal limits, and when the White House was signaling the opposite: that beating China matters more than slowing down. The largest company in the industry has now said out loud that it would consider stopping. What happens next turns on whether anyone else says it too.

Bloomberg — Sept. 11

Top Stories

Use AI

Should You Worry?

WEEKLY

One thing everyone is talking about, checked against what was actually said.

Did an AI researcher just say the technology will kill everyone?

REAL — BUT NOT ABOUT THE AI YOU USE TODAY

A researcher who spent three years on pretraining work at OpenAI and Anthropic resigned this week and posted that both companies are racing toward self-improving superintelligence. The headlines took the most alarming sentence and ran. Two things got left behind.

The first is that a departing researcher issuing a warning has become close to a genre. What made this one unusual is what happened next: Anthropic's own Alignment Science Lead, still at the company, agreed in public and put his estimate above one in ten within the decade. Senior staff almost never confirm a departing critic on the record.

The second is a line nearly every headline dropped. He said the risk from the models available right now is low, and that what concerns him is a future system improving itself faster than anyone can check it. Those are two different claims, and only one of them was made.

So, no, not the assistant on your phone — the people raising the alarm say so themselves. What they are describing is real, seriously contested inside the field, and some years out, and nobody involved claims it has been solved. Worth holding onto one caveat: a probability posted on social media is a considered guess, not a measurement.

Reported by Axios, Forbes and CBC — Sept. 9

Prompt of the Day

TIED TO TODAY'S LEAD

OpenAI says it may ease off its most advanced work, and Washington is arguing about whether to require it. Either way, the tools sitting under your workday can change without asking you. This one finds out where that would actually hurt. Paste in your job description, or just list what you did at work last week.

Below is a description of my job and the work I actually did last week. Act as an operations analyst who is skeptical of new tools, not an enthusiast. Answer four things, quoting the line from my text that supports each one: 1. Where am I now relying on an AI tool to get work done? Do not infer reliance I did not describe. 2. For each, what would I do instead if that tool were unavailable tomorrow, and roughly how much longer would it take? 3. Which single task would leave me worst off? Two sentences on why. 4. What on my list should I not be handing to an AI tool at all, and what is the risk if I keep doing it? If my text does not tell you enough to answer one of these, say so instead of guessing. Then name the one change I could make this week that would most reduce my exposure. --- [paste your job description, or a list of what you did last week]

Supplied as-is for general information. AI tools state wrong answers as confidently as right ones, so verify anything before you act on it. Nothing here is legal, financial, medical, or tax advice — for those, ask someone licensed to give it. Don't paste confidential, proprietary, or personal information into a tool whose terms let it train on what you type.